Servicios de transporte por vías navegables
RFI - Low and zero-emission operation of the boat routes between Bergen, Sunnhordland, and Hardanger
Skyss would like to understand how we can facilitate low and zero-emission operation on the boat routes in Sunnhordland, Austevoll, and between Os, Tysnes, and Kvinnherad. Work has been done on new technological systems in different parts of the market, nad the technology picture can therefore have changed somewhat since …
Norway-Bergen: Water transport services
2023/S 201-629818
Prior information notice
This notice is for prior information only
Services
Section I: Contracting authority
National registration number: 821 311 632
Postal address: postboks 7900
Town: Bergen
NUTS code: NO0A2 Vestland
Postal code: 5020
Country: Norway
Contact person: Kristian Osen Fagertun
E-mail: kristian.osen.fagertun@skyss.no
Telephone: +47 92286931
Internet address(es):
Main address: http://www.hordaland.no
Address of the buyer profile: https://kgv.doffin.no/ctm/Company/CompanyInformation/Index/2651
Section II: Object
RFI - Low and zero-emission operation of the boat routes between Bergen, Sunnhordland, and Hardanger
Skyss would like to understand how we can facilitate low and zero-emission operation on
the boat routes in Sunnhordland, Austevoll, and between Os, Tysnes, and Kvinnherad.
Work has been done on new technological systems in different parts of the market, nad
the technology picture can therefore have changed somewhat since Skyss last held a
market dialogue for express boats. We see therefore that there is a need to hold a new
dialogue round in order to update our knowledge. The dialogue is about:
• What technology concept is relevant for a tender contest in December 2024
with commissioning in January 2028?
• What are the extra costs of the different concepts?
• Should the contracting authority particularly facilitate the relevant technology concepts
as regards turn-around time, quay infrastructure, area, and network?
Skyss will, based on the information from this dialogue, consider adaptations to
the scheduled routes and present a case to the county committee in Vestland with a summary of the
technical scope for the boat routes.
Vestland County (VLFK)
RFI - Market survey
Skyss would like to understand how we can facilitate low and zero-emission operation on
the boat routes in Sunnhordland, Austevoll, and between Os, Tysnes, and Kvinnherad.
Work has been done on new technological systems in different parts of the market, nad
the technology picture can therefore have changed somewhat since Skyss last held a
market dialogue for express boats. We see therefore that there is a need to hold a new
dialogue round in order to update our knowledge. The dialogue is about:
• What technology concept is relevant for a tender contest in December 2024
with commissioning in January 2028?
• What are the extra costs of the different concepts?
• Should the contracting authority particularly facilitate the relevant technology concepts
as regards turn-around time, quay infrastructure, area, and network?
Skyss will, based on the information from this dialogue, consider adaptations to
the scheduled routes and present a case to the county committee in Vestland with a summary of the
technical scope for the boat routes.
See the attached document.
Section IV: Procedure
Section VI: Complementary information
We have formulated questions that we would like the market to give input on.
If the market has comments and input in addition to the questions given
below, we are grateful for such input.
1. Low or zero-emission concept for the routes between Bergen and Sunnhordland through a
tender contest in 2024/2025.
In order to understand the concepts, we are interested in key figures connected to energy consumption, energy storage, and
energy transfer.
1a. Battery electric concept: This has already been assessed as affordable
and available. What is the longest possible range between charging? What is
the energy consumption and battery size for such a concept? What hull design
is required for this?
i. Charging: What is the highest possible charging effect? How much time is required
for connection and disconnection? How long charging time is required per
crossing distance (for example minute per sailed km)?
ii. Battery swap concept: What energy consumption and battery size are
realistic? How often does the concept require a battery swap? How long
time does a battery swap take?
1b. Ammoniac: Are the engine and energy affordable with delivery for
a start-up of operations by 2028? How much ignition matter is required? What
requirements for NOx emissions can the engine meet? How much total CO2 cuts can we
achieve when you allow for CO2 emissions from the ignition matter and laughing gas emissions?
Are there particular requirements for bunkring that the contracting authority must know about and
facilitate?
1c. Hydrogen: Is fuel cell and energy affordable with delivery for
a start-up of operations by 2028? Are there particular requirements for bunkring
that the contracting authority must know about and facilitate?
1d. Biogas: Are the engine and energy affordable with delivery for a start-up
by 2028? Are there particular requirements for bunkring that the contracting authority must
know about and facilitate?
1e. Are there other concepts that can be relevant?
2. Potential and risk connected to the hull design and energy efficiency.
2a. Status of relevant measures such as foil, air lubrication, air cushion, and other reduction
of friction resistance. What energy efficiency will this provide in relation to the current
hull design? Does this require adaptations from the contracting authority
as regards quay infrastructure?
2b. Potential for weight reducing measures that are not normally used due to
increased cost, for example materials. What wight reduction will this provide in relation to the current
choice of materials? Does this require adaptations from the contracting authority as
regards the offer to customers?
2c. Status of propulsion system:
i. What is the availability of generator sets with higher
efficiency based on a permanent magnet generator and variable
rotational speed engine with a high load factor (not the continual output that is
normal for generator engines).
ii. Are there available gear systems suitable for electric engines, typically
without a clutch or reversing cog wheel? This is so as to give weight savings
and an increased power efficiency.
iii. Are there available propulsion systems without gears and possibly with
a fixed propellor in order to reduce potential weight and possibly give better
power efficiency?
iv. We there be new POD based propulsion systems available,
typically integrated with an electric engine and possibly revolving
systems?
3. What extra and less costs are connected to relevant low and
zero-emission concepts?