Asfaltkontrakt 33-2025-02Ø1 Øvre Buskerud

verview of Asphalt Contracts” and “Summary of Quantities and List of Sections verview of Asphalt Contracts” and “Summary of Quantities and List of Sections

CPV: 44113600 Betún y asfalto, 44113620 Asfalto, 45000000 Trabajos de construcción
Plazo:
6 de febrero de 2025 a las 11:00
Tipo de plazo:
Presentación de una oferta
Lugar de ejecución:
Asfaltkontrakt 33-2025-02Ø1 Øvre Buskerud
Organismo adjudicador:
Statens vegvesen
Número de premio:
24/295292

1. Buyer

1.1 Buyer

Official name : Statens vegvesen
Legal type of the buyer : Central government authority
Activity of the contracting authority : General public services

2. Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Title : Asfaltkontrakt 33-2025-02Ø1 Øvre Buskerud
Description : verview of Asphalt Contracts” and “Summary of Quantities and List of Sections
Procedure identifier : 90f264cf-7b97-4372-bc3e-402c57147584
Internal identifier : 24/295292
Type of procedure : Open
Justification for the accelerated procedure :
Main features of the procedure :

2.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract : Works
Main classification ( cpv ): 45000000 Construction work
Additional classification ( cpv ): 44113600 Bitumen and asphalt
Additional classification ( cpv ): 44113620 Asphalt

2.1.2 Place of performance

Country subdivision (NUTS) : Viken ( NO082 )
Country : Norway
Additional information : Europa og Riksveier i øvre Buskerud

2.1.4 General information

Legal basis :
Directive 2014/24/EU

2.1.6 Grounds for exclusion

Analogous situation like bankruptcy under national law : Is the supplier in a situation where they have been subjected to a compulsory debt settlement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Bankruptcy : Is the supplier in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Corruption : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of corruption within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the Fight against Corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C 195 of 25.6.1997, p. 1), and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This ground for exclusion also includes corruption as defined in the national law applicable to the contracting authority or the supplier.
Arrangement with creditors : Is the supplier in a situation where they have been subjected to a compulsory debt settlement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Participation in a criminal organisation : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of participation in a criminal organization within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Participation in a criminal organization as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organized crime (OJ L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42).
Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition : Has the supplier entered into agreements with other suppliers with the intention of distorting competition?
Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law : Is the supplier aware of having committed violations of environmental regulations as stipulated by national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU?
Money laundering or terrorist financing : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of money laundering or terrorist financing within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Money laundering or terrorist financing as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Fraud : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of fraud within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Fraud as referred to in Article 1 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of child labor and other forms of human trafficking within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Child labor and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Insolvency : Is the supplier in a situation of insolvency? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law : Is the supplier aware of having committed violations of labor regulations as stipulated by national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU?
Assets being administered by liquidator : Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Guilty of misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and obtained confidential information of this procedure : Has the supplier: a) Provided grossly incorrect information when supplying the details required to verify that there are no grounds for exclusion or that the qualification requirements are met, b) Failed to provide such information, c) Reserved the right to immediately submit the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) Unlawfully influenced the contracting authority’s decision-making process to obtain confidential information that may give them an unfair advantage in the competition, or negligently provided misleading information that may significantly influence decisions regarding exclusion, selection, or award?
Purely national exclusion grounds : Accepted Penalty for Punishable Offenses Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, accepted a penalty for any of the criminal offenses mentioned above, pursuant to Section 24-2, (2) a-f of the Procurement Regulations? Serious Errors Affecting Professional Integrity Has the supplier otherwise committed serious errors that cast doubt on their professional integrity, pursuant to Section 24-2, (3) i of the Procurement Regulations?
Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure : Is the supplier aware of a conflict of interest as defined in national law, the relevant announcement, or the procurement documents?
Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure : Has the supplier or an entity associated with the supplier provided advice to the contracting authority or otherwise been involved in the planning of the competition?
Guilty of grave professional misconduct : Has the supplier committed serious errors in the exercise of their profession? If relevant, refer to definitions in national law, the relevant announcement, or the procurement documents.
Early termination, damages or other comparable sanctions : Has the supplier committed a significant breach of contract in connection with the fulfillment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority, or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the termination of the contract, compensation, or other similar sanctions?
Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law : Is the supplier aware of having committed violations of social regulations as stipulated by national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents, or Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU?
Payment of social security contributions : Has the supplier failed to fulfill all their obligations to pay social security contributions both in the country where they are established and in the contracting authority’s member state, if this is a different country from where they are established?
Business activities are suspended : Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, they are still able to perform the contract, considering the applicable national regulations and measures regarding the continuation of business activities. It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of the supplier is mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Payment of taxes : Has the supplier failed to fulfill their obligations to pay taxes and duties in the country where they are established and in the contracting authority’s member state, if this is a different country from where they are established?
Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities : Has the supplier or any person who is a member of the supplier’s administrative, management, or supervisory body, or who has the power to represent, control, or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of terrorist acts or criminal offenses related to terrorist activities within the last five years, or is there a disqualification period specified directly in the judgment that is still in effect? Terrorist acts or criminal offenses related to terrorist activities as defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164 of 22.6.2002, p. 3). This ground for exclusion also includes incitement to, aiding, or attempting to commit such acts as referred to in Article 4 of the mentioned Framework Decision.

5. Lot

5.1 Lot technical ID : LOT-0000

Title : Asfaltkontrakt 33-2025-02Ø1 Øvre Buskerud
Description : verview of Asphalt Contracts” and “Summary of Quantities and List of Sections
Internal identifier : 24/295292

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract : Works
Main classification ( cpv ): 45000000 Construction work
Additional classification ( cpv ): 44113600 Bitumen and asphalt
Additional classification ( cpv ): 44113620 Asphalt

5.1.2 Place of performance

Country subdivision (NUTS) : Viken ( NO082 )
Country : Norway
Additional information : Europa og Riksveier i øvre Buskerud

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Start date : 22/04/2025
Duration end date : 03/10/2025

5.1.6 General information

Reserved participation : Participation is not reserved.
Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) : yes
This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

5.1.9 Selection criteria

Criterion :
Type : Economic and financial standing
Name : Requirements for the Supplier’s Economic and Financial Capacity
Description : 1. The supplier must have sufficient economic and financial capacity to execute the contract. 2. The supplier’s equity must be positive. 3. The supplier must have an equity ratio of at least 10%. Documentation requirements: Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier must provide the following documentation: 1. The supplier’s annual financial statements, annual reports, and audit reports for the past three years, along with more recent information (quarterly financial statements) relevant to the supplier’s financial figures. 2. A brief statement regarding any financial matters or losses not documented elsewhere, which are required to be documented according to Norwegian and/or international accounting standards. 3. An overview of any recent, ongoing, or upcoming tax or public reviews of the supplier’s business. 4. An overview of any significant events that have occurred since the release of the last audited financial statements. If the supplier has a valid reason for not providing the requested documentation, they may demonstrate their economic and financial capacity by submitting any other relevant documents pertaining to the company’s financial figures/economy. The supplier must explain why they cannot provide the documentation requested by the contracting authority.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Other
Name : Accident Frequency Rate (H1 Value)
Description : The supplier and key subcontractors should have an average H1 value for the last three years lower than 15. If the H1 value is higher than 15, the trend of the H1 value and, if applicable, the F value, which indicates the severity of a high H1 value, must be explained. If the supplier is a consortium (supplier group), the requirement applies to each participant. The H1 value is defined as the number of work-related accidents with absence relative to hours worked, multiplied by 10 to the power of 6. Documentation requirements: An overview of the H1 value for the company and key subcontractors for the last three years. If the H1 value is higher than 15, the trend of the H1 value and, if applicable, the F value must be explained. Additionally, a separate statement must be provided on whether improvement measures have been implemented, and if so, documentation of the effectiveness of these measures.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Other
Name : Support from Other Entities for Meeting Qualification Requirements
Description : The supplier may, if necessary, rely on the capacity of other entities to meet the requirements for economic and financial capacity and/or the requirements for technical and professional qualifications. Documentation requirements: The supplier must confirm that they meet this requirement when submitting the offer. In addition, each entity that the supplier relies on must submit separate ESPD forms when submitting the offer. Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier must provide the following documentation: • Documentation showing that the supplier has access to the necessary resources of the entities they rely on, such as a commitment declaration from these entities. A template for the commitment declaration is published at: https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/veg-og-gate/konkurranser-og-kontraktsdokumenter/generelle-kontraktsdokumenter/. • Documentation showing that the entity(ies) the supplier relies on meet the qualification requirement “The Supplier’s Organizational and Legal Status.” • Documentation showing that the entity(ies) the supplier relies on meet the relevant qualification requirements. • If the supplier relies on the capacity of other entities to meet the requirements for economic and financial capacity, a signed joint and several liability declaration must be provided. A template for the joint and several liability declaration is published at: https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/veg-og-gate/konkurranser-og-kontraktsdokumenter/generelle-kontraktsdokumenter/. If a supplier relies on the capacity of other entities to meet the requirements for relevant experience, these entities must perform the services or construction works that require such qualifications.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Other
Name : Suppliers Participating Jointly
Description : Multiple suppliers can participate in the competition jointly. The consortium must ensure that all qualification requirements are met. The contracting authority will assess each supplier in the consortium against the provisions for rejection, cf. § 9-5 and § 24-2, except for the provision in § 9-5 (1) letter a) and § 24-2 (1) letter a) fulfillment of qualification requirements, which will be applied to the consortium as a whole. Suppliers participating jointly will be assessed as a single entity for the qualification requirements, except for the requirements regarding the supplier’s organizational and legal status, documentation for the absence of grounds for rejection, tax certificates, and authorization for information on taxes and duties (OSA). Documentation requirements: The supplier must confirm that they meet this requirement when submitting the offer. In addition, each entity in the consortium must submit separate ESPD forms when submitting the offer. Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier must provide the following documentation: • A statement about the consortium (including the role of each participant), each participant’s organization number, address, and nationality. • The same documentation as for individual suppliers must be provided for each supplier participating in the consortium. • A declaration of joint and several liability towards the contracting authority. A template for the joint and several liability declaration is published at: https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/veg-og-gate/konkurranser-og-kontraktsdokumenter/generelle-kontraktsdokumenter/. The consortium of suppliers may, if necessary, rely on other entities to meet the qualification requirements; see the section on support from other entities for meeting qualification requirements. The contracting authority requires that the supplier who meets the requirements for relevant experience must perform the services or construction works that require such qualifications.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Other
Name : Special Provisions for Newly Established Suppliers
Description : A newly established supplier who cannot provide all the required documentation must be particularly diligent in documenting and demonstrating that they still have the capacity to execute the contract. It is especially important that such suppliers can document a sufficiently large workforce for the execution of the contract, including technical and professional qualifications. For newly established suppliers, it is emphasized that the supplier’s overall ability to execute the contract is assessed, not the competence of individual persons in isolation. If a newly established supplier has experience from contracts, the most relevant contracts that the supplier has experience with should be listed according to the documentation requirements for relevant experience. This applies even if the contracts are of a nature that does not meet the specified requirements. Lack of or insufficient documentation for one or more requirements may result in the supplier being rejected. Incomplete or incorrectly filled out response forms may also lead to rejection. Suppliers who have established themselves in a new field of expertise may also be considered newly established.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Suitability to pursue the professional activity
Name : ESPD
Description : The supplier must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) along with the offer. The provisions for exclusion due to circumstances related to the supplier are set out in Section 24-2 of the Procurement Regulations. The ESPD serves as preliminary documentation, among other things, to confirm that there are no grounds for exclusion. Additional requirements for documentation proving the absence of grounds for exclusion are outlined in Section 24-7 of the Procurement Regulations, and possibly also Section 24-5 (1) if documentation of such measures is relevant. The documentation must be submitted in accordance with the communication provisions specified in Chapter B1 and within the deadline set by the contracting authority, if the contracting authority requires this to be submitted. Certificates mentioned in Section 24-7 (1) a) and b) must not be older than 6 months from the deadline for submitting the offer. If the necessary certificates/documents to prove the absence of grounds for exclusion are not issued in the supplier’s home country or the country where they are established, or if they do not cover all the grounds for exclusion mentioned in Section 24-2 (1) b, (2) and (3) a and b of the Procurement Regulations, the completed ESPD form serves as documentation for these matters. The contracting authority may conduct its own investigations related to the supplier’s business, including participants in a supplier consortium and supported businesses of the supplier, as well as other matters relevant to assessing whether the supplier can be qualified.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Suitability to pursue the professional activity
Name : Tax certificate
Description : The supplier shall, upon request from the contracting authority, provide a tax certificate for value-added tax (VAT) and a tax certificate for income tax issued by the competent authority in the supplier’s home country or the country where the supplier is established. The certificate must document whether the supplier has fulfilled their obligations to pay taxes, fees, and social security contributions. The certificate must not be older than 6 months from the deadline for submitting the offer.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Suitability to pursue the professional activity
Name : The supplier’s organizational and legal status
Description : The supplier must be a legally established entity or consist of a consortium of suppliers that are legally established entities. This requirement also applies to any entities that the supplier relies on. Documentation requirements: Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier shall provide a certificate from the Register of Business Enterprises or an equivalent certificate for statutory registration in the country where the supplier or the entities that collectively constitute the supplier are established, as well as certificates for all supporting entities.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Suitability to pursue the professional activity
Name : Authorization for Information on Taxes and Duties (OSA)
Description : As part of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration’s (Statens vegvesen) efforts to combat labor market crime, including undeclared work and social dumping, a cooperation agreement has been established between the Norwegian Public Roads Administration and the Tax Administration. In this context, the Norwegian Public Roads Administration requires all its suppliers to provide a signed authorization granting the Norwegian Public Roads Administration the extended right to obtain information about their suppliers’ and subcontractors’ tax and duty matters, as specified in the authorization, an unlimited number of times.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Technical and professional ability
Name : Relevant Experience
Description : The supplier must have sufficient experience of a relevant nature and complexity from similar work as covered by the contract. Documentation requirements: Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier must provide the following documentation: An overview of 3-5 contracts that the supplier has completed or is completing within the last five years from the deadline for submission of the offer. The overview, as per the form included in Chapter E2, should include the following for each contract: • Name of the recipient (contracting authority). • Contact person/reference person at the contracting authority with contact details (phone number and email address), and indication of their role at the contracting authority during the contract. • Delivery date. • Contract value. • Work performed by the supplier themselves, including as the main contractor or subcontractor, and work performed by subcontractors. • Description of the contract work, including its relevance to the qualification requirement.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Technical and professional ability
Name : Execution Capability
Description : The supplier must: Have the technical and professional competence and relevant experience of key personnel offered to execute the contract. Documentation requirements: Upon request from the contracting authority, the supplier must provide the following documentation: CVs and job descriptions for key personnel, as per Chapter C, including the following roles: Project Manager Site Manager Quality Management Officer Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) Officer
Use of this criterion : Used

5.1.10 Award criteria

Criterion :
Type : Quality
Name :
Description : Refer to the EU-Supply procurement tool for a detailed description
Criterion :
Type : Price
Name :
Description :
Description of the method to be used if weighting cannot be expressed by criteria : The client will consider CO2 equivalent emissions in addition to price in this contract
Justification for not indicating the weighting of the award criteria :

5.1.11 Procurement documents

Ad hoc communication channel :
Name : eu-supply

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Terms of submission :
Electronic submission : Required
Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted : Norwegian
Electronic catalogue : Not allowed
Advanced or qualified electronic signature or seal (as defined in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014) is required
Variants : Not allowed
Deadline for receipt of tenders : 06/02/2025 11:00 +00:00
Deadline until which the tender must remain valid : 20 Week
Information about public opening :
Opening date : 06/02/2025 11:00 +00:00
Terms of contract :
The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes : No
Electronic invoicing : Required
Electronic ordering will be used : yes
Electronic payment will be used : yes

5.1.15 Techniques

Framework agreement :
No framework agreement
Information about the dynamic purchasing system :
No dynamic purchase system
Electronic auction : no

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Review organisation : Oslo District Court

8. Organisations

8.1 ORG-0001

Official name : Statens vegvesen
Registration number : 971032081
Department : Fellesfunksjoner
Postal address : Skoggata 19
Town : Moss
Postcode : 1500
Country : Norway
Contact point : Tine Maria Storhaug
Telephone : +47 95844115
Internet address : https://www.vegvesen.no
Roles of this organisation :
Buyer

8.1 ORG-0002

Official name : Oslo District Court
Registration number : 926725939
Postal address : C.J. Hambros plass 4
Town : Oslo
Postcode : 0125
Country : Norway
Telephone : +47 22035200
Roles of this organisation :
Review organisation

11. Notice information

11.1 Notice information

Notice identifier/version : dd2855ac-bb23-425a-9123-c87812edc977 - 01
Form type : Competition
Notice type : Contract or concession notice – standard regime
Notice dispatch date : 18/12/2024 15:17 +00:00
Notice dispatch date (eSender) : 18/12/2024 15:30 +00:00
Languages in which this notice is officially available : English

11.2 Publication information

Notice publication number : 00782728-2024
OJ S issue number : 248/2024
Publication date : 20/12/2024