Procurement - Toys and art materials, 2024

The contracting authority would like to use this procurement to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer. The aim of the contract is to cover the contracting authorities ́needs for toys and art materials, in accordance with the requirement specifications. Toys and art materials will mainly be procured for …

CPV: 37520000 Toys, 37000000 Musical instruments, sport goods, games, toys, handicraft, art materials and accessories, 37500000 Games and toys; fairground amusements, 37510000 Dolls, 37512000 Doll parts or accessories, 37521000 Toy musical instruments, 37522000 Wheeled toys, 37523000 Puzzles, 37524000 Games, 37527000 Toy trains and vehicles, 37820000 Art supplies, 37822000 Drawing pens, 37822100 Crayons
Deadline:
Dec. 20, 2024, 11 a.m.
Deadline type:
Submitting a bid
Place of execution:
Procurement - Toys and art materials, 2024
Awarding body:
Ålesund kommune
Award number:
24/15277

1. Buyer

1.1 Buyer

Official name : Ålesund kommune
Legal type of the buyer : Body governed by public law, controlled by a local authority
Activity of the contracting authority : General public services

2. Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Title : Procurement - Toys and art materials, 2024
Description : The contracting authority would like to use this procurement to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer. The aim of the contract is to cover the contracting authorities ́needs for toys and art materials, in accordance with the requirement specifications. Toys and art materials will mainly be procured for schools, nurseries, school timetables and other public institutions, with the exceptions stated in the requirement specifications and notes to the contract. The contracting authority ́s units vary in size, have different needs and the purchasing pattern will therefore vary from unit to unit. Comments on the contract: The Customer can bypass this agreement when purchasing used products. The following product groups are not included in this agreement: Office supplies: Stationery such as pencil, marker and pens are products that also come with the framework agreement for office supplies. In some cases it is natural to have this delivered by the supplier in office supplies, for example in cases where the customer does not deal with toys and art materials, but only office supplies. This is then allowed for cost and environmental saving reasons.
Procedure identifier : 8b734279-4d14-4c4b-a8cc-8ef2bb14d225
Internal identifier : 24/15277
Type of procedure : Open
The procedure is accelerated : no
Justification for the accelerated procedure :
Main features of the procedure : Open tender contest

2.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract : Supplies
Main classification ( cpv ): 37520000 Toys
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37000000 Musical instruments, sport goods, games, toys, handicraft, art materials and accessories
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37500000 Games and toys; fairground amusements
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37510000 Dolls
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37512000 Doll parts or accessories
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37521000 Toy musical instruments
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37522000 Wheeled toys
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37523000 Puzzles
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37524000 Games
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37527000 Toy trains and vehicles
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37820000 Art supplies
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37822000 Drawing pens
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37822100 Crayons

2.1.2 Place of performance

Country subdivision (NUTS) : Møre og Romsdal ( NO0A3 )
Additional information : The contracting authority for the competition is: Ålesund municipality Participants in the competition are the following, and there will therefore be delivery to these municipalities and companies. The procurement cooperation in Sunnmøre (municipality, including municipal companies in each municipality) Participants in the agreement: Ålesund municipality  Vanylven municipality Giske municipality Haram Municipality Fjord municipality Sande municipality Stranda municipality Sykkylven municipality Vestnes Municipality Volda Municipality Herøy municipality Ulstein municipality Ørsta municipality Sula municipality Hareid Municipality

2.1.3 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT : 6 000 000 Norwegian krone
Maximum value of the framework agreement : 8 000 000 Norwegian krone

2.1.4 General information

Legal basis :
Directive 2014/24/EU

2.1.6 Grounds for exclusion

Analogous situation like bankruptcy under national law : Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Bankruptcy : Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Corruption : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Arrangement with creditors : Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Participation in a criminal organisation : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition : Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?
Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law : Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Money laundering or terrorist financing : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Fraud : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Insolvency : Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law : Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Assets being administered by liquidator : Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Guilty of misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and obtained confidential information of this procedure : Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure : Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?
Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure : Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?
Guilty of grave professional misconduct : Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.
Early termination, damages or other comparable sanctions : Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law : Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Payment of social security contributions : Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Business activities are suspended : Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Payment of taxes : Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities : Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

5. Lot

5.1 Lot technical ID : LOT-0000

Title : Procurement - Toys and art materials, 2024
Description : The contracting authority would like to use this procurement to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer. The aim of the contract is to cover the contracting authorities ́needs for toys and art materials, in accordance with the requirement specifications. Toys and art materials will mainly be procured for schools, nurseries, school timetables and other public institutions, with the exceptions stated in the requirement specifications and notes to the contract. The contracting authority ́s units vary in size, have different needs and the purchasing pattern will therefore vary from unit to unit. Comments on the contract: The Customer can bypass this agreement when purchasing used products. The following product groups are not included in this agreement: Office supplies: Stationery such as pencil, marker and pens are products that also come with the framework agreement for office supplies. In some cases it is natural to have this delivered by the supplier in office supplies, for example in cases where the customer does not deal with toys and art materials, but only office supplies. This is then allowed for cost and environmental saving reasons.
Internal identifier : 24/15277

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract : Supplies
Main classification ( cpv ): 37520000 Toys
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37000000 Musical instruments, sport goods, games, toys, handicraft, art materials and accessories
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37500000 Games and toys; fairground amusements
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37510000 Dolls
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37512000 Doll parts or accessories
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37521000 Toy musical instruments
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37522000 Wheeled toys
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37523000 Puzzles
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37524000 Games
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37527000 Toy trains and vehicles
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37820000 Art supplies
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37822000 Drawing pens
Additional classification ( cpv ): 37822100 Crayons

5.1.2 Place of performance

Country subdivision (NUTS) : Møre og Romsdal ( NO0A3 )
Additional information : The contracting authority for the competition is: Ålesund municipality Participants in the competition are the following, and there will therefore be delivery to these municipalities and companies. The procurement cooperation in Sunnmøre (municipality, including municipal companies in each municipality) Participants in the agreement: Ålesund municipality  Vanylven municipality Giske municipality Haram Municipality Fjord municipality Sande municipality Stranda municipality Sykkylven municipality Vestnes Municipality Volda Municipality Herøy municipality Ulstein municipality Ørsta municipality Sula municipality Hareid Municipality

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Duration : 2 Year

5.1.4 Renewal

Maximum renewals : 2
The buyer reserves the right for additional purchases from the contractor, as described here : Renewal lenght is 12 months

5.1.5 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT : 6 000 000 Norwegian krone
Maximum value of the framework agreement : 8 000 000 Norwegian krone

5.1.6 General information

Reserved participation : Participation is not reserved.
Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) : yes
This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

5.1.9 Selection criteria

Criterion :
Type : Economic and financial standing
Name : Payment of tax, VAT and other public duties.
Description : This requirement only applies to Norwegian tenderers. Demand:  Tenderers must have their tax, payroll tax and VAT payments in order in accordance with the legal provisions and the tenderer must not have significant arrears. Any arrears or other irregularities must be justified. Documentation requirement: Tenderers shall document the requirement through the certificate "Information on tax and duties". The certificate shall be of the type "RF-1507" and not "RF-1316". Tenderers can order this in Altinn on behalf of their business. When ordering, state Ålesund municipality as the copy recipient, so that the contracting authority gets a copy of the certificate directly to its inbox in Altinn. Read about the certificate here: https://www.skatteetaten.no/skjema/opplysninger-om-skatt-og-avgift/ NOTE! After the tenderer has sent the tender in TendSign, the tenderer will automatically receive a request from Altinn for consent to share tax information. This consent only applies to information in accordance with "RF-1316". This is not sufficient, as the requirement in this competition is information in accordance with "RF-1507". Tenderers can, therefore, ignore the enquiry in Altinn and instead order the certificate as described above.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Other
Name : The tenderer fulfils the stated qualification requirements:
Description : All the necessary selection criteria specified in the notice or in the procurement documents mentioned in the notice are fulfilled.
Use of this criterion : Used
Criterion :
Type : Suitability to pursue the professional activity
Use of this criterion : Not used
Criterion :
Type : Technical and professional ability
Name : Quality assurance system
Description : Demand: A good and well-functioning quality management system is required for the services that shall be provided.  Documentation requirement: A concise description shall be enclosed of the overall quality management system that the tenderer will use for the implementation of the contract (max. one A4 page, table of contents will not be accepted) or a copy of the system certificate issued by accredited certification bodies.
Use of this criterion : Used

5.1.10 Award criteria

Criterion :
Type : Price
Name : Price
Description : Weighting: The award criteria is weighted 40%.  Orientation: Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form in their cost calculations and submit it as an annex to the tender in Excel format. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow shall be completed. Missing the price fields can cause difficulties in assessing the tender and the tender can then be rejected. All prices are in NOK, excluding VAT, including all direct or indirect expenses and duties that could be incurred in connection with the delivery. Order fees and invoice fees are to be seen as expenses. The prices shall include all costs for the customer who is included in this competition. Costs that the tenderer knows will be incurred, but that are not specifically stated in the tender, will be seen as included in the stated costs. NB! Note that there are three tabs in the price form, one for toys, one for the form and one for the total tender sum. Main assortment (products in the price form): Tenderers shall give prices for all the products listed in the "price form". These shall be given with cost price/purchase price + mark-up in % = tender price. Definition of cost price/purchase price:  If the tenderer manufactures the item itself, the cost price/purchase price is what it costs to produce the item. Then costs such as the purchase of raw materials and costs that apply to the production itself, such as electricity, labour and so on, will be included in the cost price. If the item is purchased externally, then it is the tenderer's cost price/purchase price plus freight etc. (into the tenderer), minus any discounts/bonuses, which makes up the item's cost price/purchase price. Can also be referred to as intake food. An example in the price form: A few examples have been given in the price form to show how one fills in the form. These are marked with "example" and have a green background colour. Select:  If product lines in the price form are submitted blank/not filled in, they will be filled in with the highest unit price offered for this product line + 10%. If more than 5% of the product lines lack a price indication, it will be seen as a significant deviation and lead to a tender being rejected in it's entirety. Individual products (one unit) and multipack (several units of the same product) are listed in the price form. Tenderers shall state the price in accordance with the unit stated in the price form. If a tenderer does not list the pack size listed in the price form, the supplier must adjust the price to the pack size in the price form. This is how we get comparable tenders. A price shall be given in several places in the price form on all colours of one product. If there are different costs/procurement prices in the different colours, an average cost price/purchase price shall be used. Other assortment (products not in the price form):  If the other assortment is procured, the tenderer shall determine the price in the following way: Toys: cost price/procurement price + calculated mark-up in % of the other assortment of toys = tender price Art materials: cost price/purchase price + calculated mark-up in % of other assortment forming = tender price Evaluation: When assessing the price, the total tender sum will be used for toys and art materials from the price form in a hybrid model with break point 1. The attached template for the evaluation model is attached.  The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.
Weight (percentage, exact) : 40
Criterion :
Type : Quality
Name : Environment
Description : Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 30%.      The award criteria consists of 2 sub-criteria: Number of environmentally labelled products; weighted 60% of this award criteria.  Other environmental measures; weighted 40% of this award criterion.  The number of environmentally labelled products sub-criteria:  The contracting authority will emphasise whether the offered products are labelled with the Swan Ecolabel, Blue Angel or an equivalent environmental label type 1. Other labelling schemes will give a lower score if the environmental labels are assessed as less relevant or comprehensive. For example, FSC/PEFC, Økotex 100, Økotex Made in Green or Greenguard will give a 25% rating compared to the Swan Ecolabel. If a tenderer offers other brands, the tenderer is responsible for substantiate that their environmental label can be seen as equal/equivalent with the marks specified above. Documentation requirement Tenderers shall mark the column "Miljømerket" in the attached price form if the offered product is environmentally labelled. The name of the marking scheme must be given, and a valid licence number must either be given, or a valid certificate/licence certificate must be enclosed.  If a tenderer encloses a valid certificate/licence certificate, tenderers must refer to the annex in the column "miljømerket" in the price form. If a licence number is provided, it must be possible to apply for a licence number on the brand scheme ́s website to check that it is valid *. * Marking schemes where it is sufficient to state valid licence numbers: The Swan Ecolabel, Økotex 100, Økotex Made in Green, FSC, PEFC. For the marking schemes Blue Angel and Greenguard, certificates/licence certificates must be enclosed with the tender, as it is not possible to apply for a licence number on these marking schemes ́ website. If other marking schemes are offered, checks must be made before submitting a tender if it is possible to check any license number on the brand scheme ́s website. Evaluation: When calculation of points on this sub-criteria, the score for the individual products will be multiplied by the estimated volume from the price form of the individual products. This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A procurement assessment will be made when evaluating the described system.  The best solution for this sub-criteria will be given the highest score (10), and other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution. If none of the tenderers achieve the highest score (10) by summing up the points for the sub-criteria, the contracting authority will add an equal percentage mark-up for all tenderers, so that the best tenderer shall achieve a point score of 10. Scores achieved on each of the sub-criteria will be multiplied by interrelated weighting and added together. Best tenders for this award criteria shall have the highest score (10). If none of the tenderers achieve the highest score (10) by summing up the points scores for the sub-criteria, the contracting authority will add an equal percentage mark-up for all tenderers so that the best tenderer shall achieve a point score of 10. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage. Sub-criteria other environmental measures:  Tenderers are requested to describe what measures the tenderer currently does and within 6 months from the start of the agreement, in order to reduce the packaging on the offered individual product, for packing and reducing the environmental impact of distribution.  The response shall be maximum 2 A4 pages. The response shall not include a cover page or table of contents. Any pages after page 2 will not be evaluated. Any links etc. in the reply will not be evaluated.  Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the sub-criteria. A procurement assessment will be made when evaluating the described system.  The best solution for this sub-criteria will be given the highest score (10), and other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution. Scores achieved on each of the sub-criteria will be multiplied by interrelated weighting and added together. Best tenders for this award criteria shall have the highest score (10). If none of the tenderers achieve the highest score (10) by summing up the points scores for the sub-criteria, the contracting authority will add an equal percentage mark-up for all tenderers so that the best tenderer shall achieve a point score of 10. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.
Weight (percentage, exact) : 30
Criterion :
Type : Quality
Name : Quality
Description : Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 20%. Orientation: As stated in the tender documentation's point "product samples", some products have been chosen from the price form for which the tenderer shall deliver product samples.  Under this criteria, the contracting authority ́s user group will undertake a procurement assessment of submitted samples. The contracting authority will focus on the evaluation of the product samples: how the goods will function for the target group based on: functionality, user friendliness and expected shelf life. Emphasis will also be put on the possibility of supplementing loose parts where possible, and tenderers are therefore requested to describe this in the product presentation.  Tenderers are requested to enclose one document in the form of a file, with presentation of the products offered in the main assortment. It shall be easy for the contracting authority to inform about which products in the price form the product is referred to.  Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the contracting authority ́s assessment of product samples. A procurement assessment will be made during the evaluation. A combined point score will be given between 1 and 10 per product, with 10 being the best. One or several tenderers can score 10 points. Other tenders will be given a relative score. The average of points per product is the tenderer ́s scored. If none of the tenderers achieve a total score of .10, for the entire award croiterium "Quality", a factor will be put on all tenders, which will mean that the best tender achieves a score of ten.
Weight (percentage, exact) : 20
Criterion :
Type : Quality
Name : Product range
Description : Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 10%. Orientation: Tenderers shall give a description of which product range will be available for the customer in the contract period. It is important that products that are 'in the times' can be offered and that the product spectrum is broad enough to cover the entities ́needs for such products. Tenderers shall describe their product range and their ability to be "in the time", both as regards new "trends" and as regards seasonal products for Christmas, Easter, etc.  Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A total procurement assessment of the described system will be carried out during the evaluation. Best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution.  The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.
Weight (percentage, exact) : 10
Description of the method to be used if weighting cannot be expressed by criteria :
Justification for not indicating the weighting of the award criteria :

5.1.11 Procurement documents

Deadline for requesting additional information : 12/12/2024 23:00 +00:00
Address of the procurement documents : https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=37485

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Terms of submission :
Electronic submission : Required
Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted : Norwegian
Electronic catalogue : Allowed
Variants : Not allowed
Tenderers may submit more than one tender : Allowed
Deadline for receipt of tenders : 20/12/2024 11:00 +00:00
Deadline until which the tender must remain valid : 89 Day
Information about public opening :
Opening date : 20/12/2024 11:05 +00:00
Terms of contract :
The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes : No
A non-disclosure agreement is required : yes
Electronic invoicing : Required
Electronic ordering will be used : yes
Electronic payment will be used : yes

5.1.15 Techniques

Framework agreement :
Framework agreement, without reopening of competition
Information about the dynamic purchasing system :
No dynamic purchase system
Electronic auction : no

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Review organisation : Møre og Romsdal tingrett

8. Organisations

8.1 ORG-0001

Official name : Ålesund kommune
Registration number : 929911709
Department : Innkjøp
Postal address : Keiser Wilhelms gate 11
Town : Ålesund
Postcode : 6003
Country : Norway
Contact point : Bente-Kristin Rødland
Telephone : +4770162000
Roles of this organisation :
Buyer

8.1 ORG-0002

Official name : Møre og Romsdal tingrett
Registration number : 926 723 200
Postal address : Postboks 1354
Town : Ålesund
Postcode : 6001
Country subdivision (NUTS) : Møre og Romsdal ( NO0A3 )
Country : Norway
Telephone : 70 33 47 00
Roles of this organisation :
Review organisation

11. Notice information

11.1 Notice information

Notice identifier/version : 504d628d-7245-4182-97c1-40affc407d5a - 01
Form type : Competition
Notice type : Contract or concession notice – standard regime
Notice dispatch date : 18/11/2024 12:30 +00:00
Notice dispatch date (eSender) : 18/11/2024 12:38 +00:00
Languages in which this notice is officially available : English

11.2 Publication information

Notice publication number : 00705396-2024
OJ S issue number : 225/2024
Publication date : 19/11/2024